JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 14, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Alfredo Ramos Maya

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Perdida de competencia por fallo ejecutoriado
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

El Senador Alfredo Ramos Maya solicitó a la Corporación realizar una audiencia inmediata en relación con el proceso de la referencia, con intervención del Gobierno Nacional y los representantes del Ministerio Público, con el fin de efectuar el seguimiento al cumplimiento de lo estipulado en la Sentencia C-379/16.

Igualmente pidió, suspender todos los actos y hechos relacionados con la implementación de la Ley 1806 de 1016, hasta cuando no se subsanen todos los mandatos impartidos por la Corte Constitucional en la referida providencia.

Por no resultar factible atender la solicitud elevada por el honorable Senador, la Sala Plena decide DENEGARLA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE
  2. NEGAR la petición presentada ante la Corte por el Honorable Senador Alfredo Ramos Maya, conforme los considerandos de este proveído.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.